|
KMID : 1234820090100020011
|
|
Korean Society of Law and Medicine
2009 Volume.10 No. 2 p.11 ~ p.36
|
|
|
The Trend of Precedents about Calculation of Damage Compensation for Last Decade
|
|
Park Young-Ho
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
This thesis introduces the trends of korean courts’ ruling on damages in medical malpractice cases for past 10 years. First of all, Korean courts’ ruling have had a tendency to pay only non-economic damages for not taking the informed consent. If a doctor cannot get the informed consent from a patient, he compensate only non-economic damages for the infringement of self-determination rights of patient. It’s enough for the plaintiff to prove the infringement of self-determination rights, if the plaintiff just want to get non-economic damages. The Korean Supreme court have ruled that if plaintiffs want to get economic damages for the infringement of self-determination rights or informed consent, plaintiffs must prove that the infringement of self-determination rights is the proximate cause of the economic damages of patient. There is another tendency for the Korean Supreme court to limit the damages in medical malpractice cases on the ground of patient’s diseases’ dangerousness or patient’s idiosyncrasy. In the past courts often limit the damages only to 70~80% of total damages, but now a days courts mostly limit the damages to 20~30%. This thesis also introduce the Korean courts’ trends about Valuing damages in personal injury actions awarded for gratuitously rendered nursing and medical care.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
informed consnet, pain and suffering, loss of chance, family, damage, limitation of damage, cmparative damage, Selbstbestimmungsrecht, Diagnoseaufklarung, erlaufsaufklrung
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|